Reframe the Cloudflare Worker gateway across the entry points where a
reader forms an impression of it, in both languages:
- README §2 / §5 (en+zh): the gateway is optional and exists because
Cloudflare's Load Balancer product is not on the free plan. Drop the
comparison row that listed 'only the 19 safelisted paths' against
'every route' as if the safelist were a benefit; replace it with
backend reachability, which is identical either way, and move the
route-count fact to its own neutral row. Add one sentence to §5 that
the gateway is outside the secret boundary.
- deployment.md §10 (en+zh): purpose is load balancing, not protection;
no intent to hide or harden the backends, no access control at the
edge, the allowlist is not a firewall.
- cloudflare-worker README (en+zh): new 'why it exists' / 'why it is
not a security feature' block, plus a 'not a security layer' bullet.
Drop 'access-hiding capability' from the non-capabilities list, since
claiming invisibility as something we refuse to provide implies it is
the interesting axis.
- reference.md §4 / §9.2 (en+zh) and deployment.md zh §2: stop saying
bootstrap and /debug/* are 'not exposed' / 'kept off the public path'.
They are simply not in the route set, which is why a request to the
Worker never reaches them — reachable at the backend's own address
either way.
- charter ARCH-LB-WORKER (en+zh): 'only external entrance' -> 'only
*registered* entrance', which is what C-LB-SINGLE-REG-URL actually
says, and backends stay directly reachable.
SAF-LB-PASSTHRU already records the security-side invariant (no auth
or body rewriting, backend may be directly connected to the public
network), so no new stable ID is needed. No code changes; GATE-DOCS
6/6.
10.2 now spells out that every Redis key is globally named with no
instance dimension, tabulates the shared state (config blob, global
revision, enable gate, cursor, streams, reconcile lock) and records
two consequences: the business configuration exists once so an SPA
edit from any origin writes the same copy (intended, no per-instance
slot exists), and CONFIG_ENCRYPTION_KEY must be byte-identical across
origins since it is the AES-256-GCM key and the SPA admin credential.
Extra origins buy failover, not throughput, because /reconcile is
serialized by lock:reconcile and the cursor is singular.
New 10.8 documents lazy convergence at the request boundary via
refresh_business_config, and the known behavior that a build_worker
failure advances the local revision so the instance does not retry
until a new revision is written. Includes detection via the live field
values in GET /debug/config, the warning that its revision field is the
global Redis value and cannot show convergence, and recovery by
bumping the revision again.
Appended as 10.8 rather than renumbering 10.3-10.7, which charter.md
NFR-HA-MULTI-INSTANCE cites. No code changes; GATE-DOCS 6/6.
The retire-on-change commit inserted ~500 lines into notify.rs and ~110
into state.rs, shifting every anchor at or after the insertion point.
The ANCHOR audit only proves the referenced line exists and is
non-empty, so all of these passed while pointing at the wrong code:
deployment.md/.zh-CN register_telegram_webhook 1619 -> 1623
register_push 1464 -> 1468 (EN)
register_telegram_webhook 1439 -> 1623 (zh)
register_push 1315 -> 1468 (zh)
retired.md/.zh-CN registration_lock fmt 1328-1330 -> 1481-1483
register_push 1315 -> 1468
state.rs read_batch 491 -> 506
state.rs query_async 531 -> 546
state.rs XGROUP CREATE 499-507 -> 514-522
opengaps.md/.zh-CN get_reconcile_state 777 -> 792
set_reconcile_state 785 -> 800
acquire_lock 1076 -> 1130
Every target was verified against the source before editing: two of the
pre-existing anchors pointed inside a different function than the one
they named, and the EN deployment.md had both register anchors off while
the zh twin still carried the original pre-move numbers.
Also documents the new push:registration:current key in the Redis key
table (writer, readers, TTL, and why its literal suffix cannot collide
with the hex session_digest suffix) and carries the zh twin the EN
version already got. Mirror the retire-on-change contract in
deployment.zh-CN.md - the zh twin has its own callback section, which
the EN update skipped.